Un método 3D para estimar el efecto de osteotomías desrotadoras sobre alteraciones torsionales de fémur / A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion

Introducción y objetivos: La medición precisa de la torsión femoral es esencial para el diagnóstico, indicación y planificación preoperatoria de las osteotomías desrotadoras femorales en pacientes con inestabilidad patelofemoral o dolor anterior de rodilla. Se han descrito múltiples métodos de medición, con valores muy diferentes entre ellos y ninguno de ellos permite establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria para devolver la torsión a valores normales. El objetivo del presente trabajo es desarrollar un método de medición que permita no solo el diagnóstico de pacientes con alteraciones torsionales, sino también establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria durante la cirugía. Material y métodos: Se seleccionaron 30 pacientes sin antecedentes de patología patelofemoral que disponían de una tomografía completa de miembros inferiores por otros motivos, siendo considerados así pacientes normales. Se calculó su torsión femoral mediante los métodos de Jeanmart y de Murphy por dos radiólogos independientes. Por otra parte, dos cirujanos ortopédicos independientes realizaron la medición de la torsión mediante el método 3D propuesto. Se evaluó el comportamiento normal de los datos y se definió la variabilidad intra- e interobservador del método 3D mediante su coeficiente de correlación intraclase y mediante el gráfico de Bland-Altman, realizando una comparación cuantitativa y cualitativa respectivamente con los métodos clásicos. Se estableció el intervalo de confianza de los valores normales con el nuevo método 3D y finalmente, se analizó al patrón de regresión lineal entre los métodos de Jeanmart y Murphy con el método de medición 3D. Resultados: La media de torsión femoral con el método 3D fue de 12,74° (DE 5,96°, IC 95%: 11,67 a 13,82°). Con el método de Jeanmart, esta fue de 12,84° (DE 8,60°, IC 95%: 11,28 a 14,39°) y de 15,87° (DE 10,68°, IC 95%: 13,94 a 17,80°) con el método de Murphy.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. Material and methods: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland–Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. Results: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67° to 13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28° to 14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94° to 17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high.(AU)

[Translated article] A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion / Un método 3D para estimar el efecto de osteotomías desrotadoras sobre alteraciones torsionales de fémur

Introducción y objetivos: La medición precisa de la torsión femoral es esencial para el diagnóstico, indicación y planificación preoperatoria de las osteotomías desrotadoras femorales en pacientes con inestabilidad patelofemoral o dolor anterior de rodilla. Se han descrito múltiples métodos de medición, con valores muy diferentes entre ellos y ninguno de ellos permite establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria para devolver la torsión a valores normales. El objetivo del presente trabajo es desarrollar un método de medición que permita no solo el diagnóstico de pacientes con alteraciones torsionales, sino también establecer la magnitud de la osteotomía necesaria durante la cirugía. Material y métodos: Se seleccionaron 30 pacientes sin antecedentes de patología patelofemoral que disponían de una tomografía completa de miembros inferiores por otros motivos, siendo considerados así pacientes normales. Se calculó su torsión femoral mediante los métodos de Jeanmart y de Murphy por dos radiólogos independientes. Por otra parte, dos cirujanos ortopédicos independientes realizaron la medición de la torsión mediante el método 3D propuesto. Se evaluó el comportamiento normal de los datos y se definió la variabilidad intra- e interobservador del método 3D mediante su coeficiente de correlación intraclase y mediante el gráfico de Bland-Altman, realizando una comparación cuantitativa y cualitativa respectivamente con los métodos clásicos. Se estableció el intervalo de confianza de los valores normales con el nuevo método 3D y finalmente, se analizó al patrón de regresión lineal entre los métodos de Jeanmart y Murphy con el método de medición 3D. Resultados: La media de torsión femoral con el método 3D fue de 12,74° (DE 5,96°, IC 95%: 11,67 a 13,82°). Con el método de Jeanmart, esta fue de 12,84° (DE 8,60°, IC 95%: 11,28 a 14,39°) y de 15,87° (DE 10,68°, IC 95%: 13,94 a 17,80°) con el método de Murphy.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. Material and methods: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland–Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. Results: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67° to 13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28° to 14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94° to 17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high.(AU)

Conceptos actuales en osteotomías en doble nivel alrededor de la rodilla / Current concepts in double-level osteotomies around the knee

Con la osteotomía en un solo nivel, se puede lograr la corrección del eje de la extremidad en pacientes con deformidades combinadas femoral y tibial, pero de forma simultánea generará una alteración patológica de oblicuidad de la interlínea articular, lo que conducirá a elongación ligamentaria, inestabilidad, degeneración condral y, en última instancia, comprometerá su sobrevida y los resultados funcionales. En virtud del análisis de la literatura más reciente, podemos concluir que existe un número significativo de pacientes que requieren de un procedimiento combinado para lograr un objetivo biomecánico óptimo. La finalidad de una osteotomía en doble nivel alrededor de la rodilla consiste en restablecer la anatomía normal, descargar el compartimiento afectado, normalizar los ángulos mecánicos y la orientación de la interlínea articular. Los ejes fisiológicos pueden restablecerse a través de un análisis preoperatorio exhaustivo, respetando principios biomecánicos y fijación estable con placas bloqueadas. Es un procedimiento demandante y con indicaciones en evolución, que progresivamente se ha instaurado como una alternativa de tratamiento justificada en estudios clínicos y biomecánicos para el manejo de deformidades severas alrededor de la rodilla.

With single-level osteotomy, correction of the limb axis in patients with combined femoral and tibial deformities can be achieved. This correction, however, will generate a pathological alteration in the joint line oblicuity, leading to ligament elongation, instability, joint degeneration and, ultimately, it will compromise the longevity and functional results of the correction. By analyzing the most recent literature, we can conclude that there is a significant number of patients who require a combined procedure to achieve an optimal biomechanical goal. The purpose of a double-level osteotomy around the knee is to restore normal anatomy, unload the affected compartment, normalize the mechanical angles and the orientation of the joint line. Physiological axes can be reestablished by means of a thorough preoperative analysis, observing the biomechanical principles and stable fixation with locked plates. It is a demanding procedure with increasing indications, which has progressively been established in clinical and biomechanical studies as a justified treatment alternative for the management of severe deformities around the knee.

[Translated article] A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland-Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. RESULTS: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67°-13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28°-14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94°-17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high. CONCLUSION: The method presented in this study allows for the reliable quantification of femoral torsion in a reproducible way. This method can be applied in several open access 3D image programmes what makes its implementation in the healthcare centres possible from now on.

A 3D method to estimate the effect of derotational osteotomies over femoral maltorsion. / Un método 3D para estimar el efecto de osteotomías desrotadoras sobre alteraciones torsionales de fémur.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland-Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed. RESULTS: The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67° to 13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28° to 14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94° to 17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high. CONCLUSION: The method presented in this study allows for the reliable quantification of femoral torsion in a reproducible way. This method can be applied in several open access 3D image programs what makes its implementation in the healthcare centers possible from now on.

Prótesis de superficie de cadera en presencia de osteosíntesis femoral proximal / Hip resurfacing in the presence of proximal femoral osteotomy

Describimos un caso de reemplazo de superficie de cadera en un paciente con artrosis posterior a necrosis ósea avascular y material de osteosíntesis femoral proximal de difícil extracción. Con las prótesis de superficie se logran buenos resultados si la indicación y la técnica quirúrgica son las correctas. En este caso, facilitó mucho la artroplastia, con un muy buen resultado funcional; se evita una cirugía con mayor morbilidad y una tasa más alta de complicaciones y revisiones, como ocurre con los reemplazos de cadera convencionales tras el retiro de la osteosíntesis proximal de fémur. Los cirujanos de cadera atendemos a estos pacientes con frecuencia; estamos seguros de que este tipo de cirugías debe incluirse en nuestro arsenal terapéutico. A pesar de las desventajas de esta artroplastia (fricción metal/metal, curva de aprendizaje, fracturas del cuello femoral), consideramos que, en estos casos, dichas complicaciones están compensadas por la simplicidad del procedimiento.

We describe a hip resurfacing case in a patient with arthrosis after avascular necrosis and proximal femoral osteosynthesis material difficult to remove. Hip resurfacing achieves good results when its indication and technique are correct. In this case, it facilitated the arthroplasty achieving an excellent functional result; avoiding a major surgery and the high rate of complications and revisions, as it occurs with conventional hip replacements after osteosynthesis of the proximal femur. Surgeons frequently face this type of patients; therefore we are convinced that this procedure must be in our therapeutic arsenal. Besides the disadvantages of this arthroplasty (metal on metal friction, learning curve, neck fracture) we consider that they are compensated for by the simplicity of the procedure.